My father gave a guarantee to his Friend for a Loan of RS 50 lacs in the yr…

My father gave a guarantee to his Friend for a Loan of RS 50 lacs in the yr 2002 who defaulted the payment which is now 1 crore along with interest. He took this loan against the mortgaged of 3 Flats situated at malad. He submitted to the bank the sale agreement along with the NOC from builder and also the letter from the builder that the builder would not assign or create a third party interest in the same flats. Now the friend of my father has defaulted the Loan amount and a suit has been instituted against him in Sept 2009 and also the guarantors. But the copy of it is only served on the principal borrower and not on the Guarantors. My father came to know about this from his friend. Also my father friend informed the bank that they can attach that 3 flats which is been mortgaged and recover their amount but we came to know that the 3 flats were sold by the builder to the 3 rd party when the title deeds as well as the lock and key were with the bank. Even he has given the indemnity to the bank that he will register the flats as and when required by the bank but he has not registered it. My father who was a salaried and now retired came to know from his friend that bank has ask an interim relief for the flat of my father as well as flat of the borrower’s Father who is the First guarantor even this is not service on my father. My main contention to ask u is that my father does not have any property in his name only 50% ownership of the above flat and other 50 % in my mother name. Also that 50% he has gifted to my mother on May 2008 and it is notarized but not registered. He registered the same by a deed of confirmation after the suit has been instituted but not been served on him. Now the Flats stands in my mother’s name, is then can the bank proceed with the interim relief and attach the flat which is in the name of my mother. Also show me the remedy against the bank, principal borrower as well as builder when the loan was already secured by the mortgaged property how can they proceeed with the other things, Infact bank has scrutinized all the documents and given the loan and why are they not attaching that 3 flats mortgaged and recovering their money.

election law in coop hsg soc in maharashtra india Is it not incumbant upon the…

election law in coop hsg soc in maharashtra india
Is it not incumbant upon the registrar to ensure that elections to the subject society are carried out as per provisions of law? In our society which was registered in 1998,no elections have ever been carried out ever since and any one occupies the posts of secretary and a reference to the sub registrar vasai under RTI has elicited the response that this is the subject matter of litigation in the cooperative court.He has though admitted that indemnity bond in form M 20 has not been submitted,but again he says that he will initiate action only if he deems fit. Can the Sub registrar take such a stand?

Our Housing society got converted into “NON TRADING CORPORATION” in 1988.

Our Housing society got converted into “NON TRADING CORPORATION” in 1988. This was done to safeguard members interest .One of the rules then made was: “one plot one owner”, this was done for reasons, mainly:
1. The plots will not get divided incase there are more owners.
2. The executive committee will be dealing with a single person to avoid any unpleasantness in future.
3. To avoid any multiple house constructions in a single plot.
Recently one of the members took a “NOC” (No objection Certificate) from the committee to sell his plot. This was given in name of a single person. However he sold it to two brothers in joint name thus violating the rule. The sale deed is registered. When the committee objected to this the new owner offered to give an Indemnity Bond specifying that the plot will not be subdivided. However it is not clear as who will be the “main or principle owner”.
This has created a problem as the committee is in dilemma as regards to the legality of the sale deed and whether to give the possession letter or not? More over this may become a precedence for future cases.
Our questions are:
1. What are the options left to the Executive committee or new owners to correct this?
2. What is “Indemnity Bond” and how binding it is on the owners?
3. Can a person sell to multiple owners even after the NOC is given for selling in single name?
I shall be thankful for guidance on this issue and request reply on my e-mail id
With regards
SKSingh